Confessions of an economic hitman book VideoConfessions of an Economic Hit Man - Audio Book
Confessions of an economic hitman book - thankThe sixth-born son of the pro wrestling dynasty founded by Stu Hart and his elegant wife, Helen, Bret Hart is a Canadian icon. From his early twenties until he retired at 43, Hart kept an audio diary, recording stories of the wrestling life, the relentless travel, the practical jokes, the sex and drugs, and the real rivalries as opposed to the staged ones. The result is an intimate, no-holds-barred account that will keep readers, not just wrestling fans, riveted. But he also paid the price in betrayals most famously by Vince McMahon, a man he had served loyally ; in tragic deaths, including the loss of his brother Owen, who died when a stunt went terribly wrong; and in his own massive stroke, most likely resulting from a concussion he received in the ring, and from which, with the spirit of a true champion, he has battled back. He is proud that in all his years in the ring he never seriously hurt a single wrestler, yet did his utmost to deliver to his fans an experience as credible as it was exciting. He also records the incredible toll the business takes on its workhorses: he estimates that twenty or more of the wrestlers he was regularly matched with have died young, weakened by their own coping mechanisms, namely drugs, alcohol, and steroids. That toll included his own brother-in-law, Davey Boy Smith. No one has ever written about Score: 1. confessions of an economic hitman book
Such sentiments are routine for liberals and hardly unknown among social democrats.
Browse more videos
Such sentiments are, to anyone who cares to pursue a study of history, quite ahistorical. Violence, force and coercion — exemplified in the widespread use of slave labor, imperialist conquests of peoples around the world and ruthless extraction of natural resources — pervades the entire history of capitalism.
To follow up on my previous article discussing how U. Perkins, for those not familiar with his book, provides a first-hand account of how the U. That is no surprise to anyone paying attention, but the book became an improbable best-seller, meaning there must have been many eyes confessions of an economic hitman book. That can only be a positive development. But even Mr. Given the outstanding service he has provided in writing his book, and the physical danger that he put himself in to publish it he postponed writing it multiple times fearing possible consequencesleast of all do I want to imply criticism or raise any snarky accusations against Mr. My point here is that even a strong critic of U. The all-encompassing pervasiveness of capitalist propaganda, and that the relentless dissemination of it across every conceivable media and institutional outlet, still leaves most people with a wistful idealization of some earlier, innocent capitalism not yet befouled by anti-social behavior and violence or by greed.
Horrific, state-directed violence in massive doses enabled capitalism to slowly establish itselfthen methodically expand from its northwestern European beginnings.
English lords wanted to transform arable land into sheep meadows to take advantage of the demand for wool, and began razing peasant cottages to clear the land. For example, beginning with the Tudors, England created a series of stern measures to prevent peasants from drifting into vagrancy or falling back onto welfare systems. According to a statute, beggars over the age of fourteen were to be severely flogged and branded with a red-hot iron on the left ear unless someone was willing to take them into service for two years. Repeat offenders over the age of eighteen were to be executed unless someone would take them into service. Third offenses automatically resulted in execution. As industrial resistance gathered steam, the British government employed 12, troops to repress craft workers, artisans, factory workers and small confessions of an economic hitman book who were resisting the introduction of machinery by capitalists, seeing these machines as threats to their freedom and dignity.
Slavery critical to capitalist accumulation Nor can the role of slavery in bootstrapping the rise of capitalism be ignored. The slave trade, until the end of the seventeenth century, was conducted by government monopolies. Britain and other European powers earned far more from the plantations of their Caribbean colonies than from North American possessions; war carolingian civil Caribbean produce could not be grown in Europe, while North American colonies tended to produce what Europe could already provide for itself. Britain profited enormously from the triangular trade, both in the slave trade itself and the surpluses generated from plantation crops produced with slave labor. Proceeds from the slave trade were large enough to lift the prosperity of the British economy as a whole, provide the investment funds to build the infrastructure necessary to support industry and the scale confessions of an economic hitman book trade resulting from a growing industrial economy, and ease credit problems.
And no other thing have they done for forty years until this confessions of an economic hitman book, and still today see fit to do, but dismember, slay, perturb, afflict, torment, and destroy the Indians by all manner of cruelty — new and divers and most singular manners such as never before seen or read of heard of — some few of which shall be recounted below, and they do this to such a degree that on the Island of Hispaniola, of the above three million souls that we once saw, today there be no more than two hundred of those native people remaining.
The British replaced the Spanish, using more modern financial means to exploit the region. Argentina flung its ports wide open to trade click British influence, flooding itself with a deluge of European goods sufficient to strangle nascent local production; when Argentina later attempted to escape dependency by imposing trade barriers in order to build up its own industry, British and French warships forced the country open again. We are concentrating on Britain for the moment because it was the leading capitalist power at this time.
British warships were sent to China to force the Chinese to import opium, a drug that was illegal back home. Britain controlled India and oversaw one million Indian opium farmers. They were aware of its poisonous effects on the Chinese people, but few of them ever mentioned the drug in the thousands of pages of letters and documents they sent back to America.
After a refusal, Chinese authorities destroyed all the opium they could find. In response, British warships were sent to bombard coastal cities until China agreed to the one-sided Treaty of Nanking, in which it was forced to pay Britain an indemnity of millions, to cede Hong Kong hitan to open five ports to trade, where foreigners were not subject to Chinese law or authorities.]