Mistaken: Miranda v arizona result
|Republican party 1856||Examples of aerobic respiration|
|Martin luther king jr biography essay||Why did president carter grant amnesty|
|Miranda v arizona result||318|
The Supreme Court in most countries is responsible for exclusively hearing appeals of various legal issues. They have been given authority by the constitution to do the following.
They check the actions of the president as well as that of the Congress; they are the final judge of all cases that involve the Congress and have the right to correct the head of state, the government or the Congress whenever their actions do not comply with the constitution. However, in this paper, I will be discussing the famous Miranda v Arizona case. Arizona is actually a small state to the south-west region the United States.
The thesis of the statement is as follows. On 13th Marchthe Phoenix police department arrested a man by the name Ernesto Miranda. This arrest was based on certain circumstantial evidence that linked Miranda to the kidnap and rape of an year-old defenseless woman about 10 years earlier. Miranda, under police custody, was interrogated for over 2 hours and afterward signed a confession of rape charges that included the following statement: I hereby swear that this statement I am making is voluntary and out of my own free will. I made this statement without being threatened, submitted to coercion or promises of immunity and with full knowledge of my legal rights. I also miranda v arizona result that any statement I make will be used against me in a court of law. In true sense, Mr. Miranda was not informed of his legal rights of counsel; he was also not informed of his rights to remain silent.
In addition, Miranda was not informed that ariznoa his actions and words would be used against him in a court of law. Alvin Moore was the courts appointed a lawyer for Ernesto Morgan, The lawyer objected the facts arguing that his confession was not entirely voluntarily based miranda v arizona result the above information.
Thus, the evidence should be excluded. The judge further sentenced Miranda to a year imprisonment. Moore took a step further and filed his appeal to the Supreme Court arguing that the confession Miranda made was not entirely voluntary. The Supreme Court, however, dismissed his appeal claiming that Miranda personally did not request for an attorney.
Recently Added Photos
The Miranda resulf came to be after the historic event of the case of Miranda v Arizona. Therefore, in the Supreme Court decided to have a 5th amendment in the constitution known as the Miranda rights. These rights were to inform the criminal suspects about http://rectoria.unal.edu.co/uploads/tx_felogin/art-therapy-and-the-creative-process/what-is-american-democracy-definition.php actions they are allowed to take under police custody. The Fifth Amendment now demands the police to tell miranda v arizona result suspect the following four things. This right means that one can mmiranda choose to speak up and defend himself or point fingers at others. This web page way, one can also choose to keep quiet about all allegations.
Choosing to speak or not to speak while being arrested is a constitutional right for the suspect. This right actually means what whatever allegation, threat; evidence and additional information among other statements that may be made by the criminal suspect will be used as evidence in a court of law, against his defense.
This right is explaining miranda v arizona result first statement on the right of a person to keep quiet or remain silent. Therefore, a person who is being arrested can choose to remain silent because any statement that comes out of his mouth will be used against him. This right means that the suspect, even under police custody should be allowed to contact and converse with their attorney. They have legal rights to communicate with them, in case they need any help from them.]