CourtListener is a project of Free Law Projecta federally-recognized c 3 non-profit. We rely on donations for our financial security. Donate Now. Sign In Register. Filed: September 10th, Precedential Status: Precedential.
Blaine Slater | Servant Leadership
Citations: None known. Docket Number: PD Your Notes edit none.
Cited By 0 This case has not yet been cited in our system. Lykos v. Fine, S. Ceballos, U. Myers, U. Please support our work with dah donation. Anthony G. Buzbee Thomas R. Phillips State Bar No. Botsford State Bar No. Austin, Texas dbotsford aol. Appellant's Counsel: Anthony G. Phillips, 98 San Jacinto Blvd. Reasons for Review.
Explanation of Reasons for Review. However, the State Prosecuting Attorney has requested oral argument in her petition filed on August 28, Governor Perry continues to believe that oral argument would not aid the Court's understanding and disposition of any of the grounds for review presented by either side. Nonetheless, Governor Perry is willing to present oral argument should the Court request, but he respectfully reiterates his request that any argument be scheduled on an expedited servqnt.
Statement of the Case In Augusta two-count indictment was returned against Here Perry for violating Sections In a published opinion, that court granted relief on Count II because the statute was unconstitutionally overbroad, TAB 1 at modern day servant leaders but denied relief on Count I on cognizability grounds.
Governor Perry's petition for discretionary review, filed on August 18,seeks review only of the Court of Appeals' opinion regarding cognizability as to Count I. Because the State Prosecuting Attorney has subsequently filed a petition seeking review on Count II, this supplement is being filed, seeking review of the court of appeals' opinion regarding cognizability as to Count II if, but only if, this Court grants review of the State's petition.
Thus, none of the supplemental grounds presented modern day servant leaders more info petition need to be addressed by this Court unless it first determines that the judgment of the court of appeals as to Count II was in error and should be reversed. See TAB 1 at See TAB 1.
Topics on Servanthood
Governor Perry did not file a motion for rehearing. Governor Perry filed srrvant initial petition for discretionary review click August 18, On August 28,the State Prosecuting Attorney filed a petition for discretionary review. On September 7,Governor Perry attempted to electronically file a cross-petition for discretionary review under Rule ]