American paradox psychology -

American paradox psychology

American paradox psychology - history!

Abstract: Well-being in the broadest sense is what we have when we are living lives that are not necessarily morally good, but good for us. In philosophy, well-being has been an important topic of inquiry for millennia. In psychology, well-being as a topic has been gathering steam very recently and this research is now at a stage that warrants the attention of philosophers. The most popular theories of well-being in the two fields are similar enough to suggest the possibility of interdisciplinary collaboration. Those questions center on the nature, measurement, and moral significance of well-being. I also argue that the life-satisfaction theory is particularly well suited to meet the various demands on a theory of well-being. Comment: Tiberius provides a nice exposition of the key approaches to well-being in the philosophical tradition and briefly argues for the 'life-satisfaction' account, but the main thrust of the paper is to introduce areas of overlap with research in psychology and to flag up ways in which philosophy could make a contribution. Some sections could certainly serve as introductory reading to either the philosophical or psychological literature, and the paper as a whole would work well in an applied or inter-disciplinary module.

American paradox psychology - something

Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology. Ambiguity aversion originally reported in conjunction with Ellsberg paradox appears to have established a law-like status in both empirical and normative researches that are mostly confined in the betting context. The present paper was designed to test its generality in a wider, natural context, using three psychological measures belief, preference and willingness. Subjects responded to these measures in the choice problems of a hospital and a driving-school that differed in the locus of control over outcome uncertainties. The effects of framing and relativity of uncertainty were examined as the between-subjects factors. The results were in sharp contrast with the previous findings. That is, there was little evidence for ambiguity aversion, but ambiguity seeking and indifference were predominant. Ambiguity seeking was more pronounced in willingness than in belief. Through the MANOVA tests, the effects of framing and the relativity of uncertainty information were confirmed in belief and willingness, respectively. american paradox psychology

Try adding this search to your want list. Millions of books are added to our site everyday and when we find one that matches your search, we'll send you an e-mail.

american paradox psychology

Best of all, it's free. Did you know that sinceBiblio has used its profits to build 16 public libraries in rural villages of South America?

Helping you include authors from under-represented groups in your teaching

Home Price Comparison More search options. Stock Photo. Better World Books.

american paradox psychology

Seller rating : This seller has earned a 5 of 5 Stars rating from Biblio customers. Show Details Description:. Add to basket Buy Now Item Price.

Navigation menu

Used hardcover. Seller rating : This seller has earned a 3 of 5 Stars rating from Biblio customers. Didn't find what you're looking for? Add to want list.

ISBN 10: 1433810530

Are you a frequent reader or book collector? Learn More. Social Responsibility Did you know that sinceBiblio has used its profits to build 16 public libraries in rural villages of South America?]

One thought on “American paradox psychology

Add comment

Your e-mail won't be published. Mandatory fields *