Inductive vs deductive method -

Inductive vs deductive method Video

Deductive vs Inductive vs Abductive Reasoning

Inductive vs deductive method - with you

Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. DOI: The research instrument used is a pre-post-test developed by the researchers… Expand. View via Publisher. Save to Library. Create Alert. Launch Research Feed. Share This Paper. Tables from this paper. Inductive vs deductive method inductive vs deductive method.


Neurosurgeon Michael Egnor is we could have called this one not impressed:. The Big Bang, to take an example, was not an event in the natural world. It was a singularity, induuctive means that it is undefined and undefinable both mathematically and inductive vs deductive method conventional physics.

Similarly, a cosmological singularity — for example, a black hole — is also a supernatural entity. That just means it is outside of nature. We never observe black holes just as we never can observe the Click Bang.

inductive vs deductive method

We can only infer — by inductive reasoning — the existence of supernatural entities such as black holes by their effects in the natural world. We cannot observe God in this life because he is not part of this world. He is supernatural. But we can observe his effects in the natural world just as we inferred the existence of the Big Bang and black holes by observing inductkve effects. It is the same sort of reasoning.

Inductive Format Essay

inductive vs deductive method The empirical evidence is the presence of change in nature. Because infinite regress is logically impossible in an essentially ordered chain of changes, there must be a Prime Mover to begin the process and that is what we call God. Michael Egnor. The same goes for, well, all of biochemistry and most vz cell biology. We never actually observe, say, nerve cells firing, only their effects on needles on our monitors.

inductive vs deductive method

Therefore brains must be supernatural too! OK, but black holes were predicted from theory. The theory said they should exist, and gave novel predictions that told us how we would see the effects of black holes. So what is the theory that gives us novel predictions that would show us the effects of God? To say something should exist is very different from having witnessed something.]

inductive vs deductive method

One thought on “Inductive vs deductive method

  1. Excuse, that I interrupt you, I too would like to express the opinion.

  2. I think, that you are not right. I can prove it. Write to me in PM.

  3. Completely I share your opinion. It seems to me it is very good idea. Completely with you I will agree.

  4. In it something is also to me your idea is pleasant. I suggest to take out for the general discussion.

  5. More precisely does not happen

Add comment

Your e-mail won't be published. Mandatory fields *