Impact of letter from birmingham jail VideoLetter from Birmingham Jail by Shmoop impact of letter from birmingham jail
In his letter, it was intentionally written to respond to criticisms of the eight white clergymen on him and his fellow activists, in making such a foolish and inappropriate acts. His main audiences are the clergymen and white moderates who do not agree with the black community movement.
Throughout the letter, King uses a combination of ethos, logos, and pathos to express his frustration with criticisms from clergymen. King initially responds to the criticism with an effectively use of ethos in his opening letter.
King establishes his credibility by announcing his title as President. Here, he represents the numbers of his organizations across the South to provides him with an image of power and clearly impact of letter from birmingham jail the clergymen that he is part of the city because one of his organization is located here. He is not an unknown person who come in the city to do protest, instead being here in the name of president. He uses this comparison to show the similarity of his action like a good will mission of Apostle Paul, which King, himself, travels to cities around USA to bring peace, and freedom to the society. jsil
This allows his audiences to see that he is a trustworthy man, who tries to bring people out of darkness like prophets did in the past. They know what they would impact of letter from birmingham jail and willing to accept the consequence. King is not reckless in his action, instead he has a well-planned and organized. Furthermore, he does reference his Civil Right Movement and label himself to many of the historical examples http://rectoria.unal.edu.co/uploads/tx_felogin/benjamin-franklin-s-theory-of-life-and/james-huberty-wife.php as Socrates who provokes a tension in the society to bring people out of the myths and false belief, or even Amos who is an extremist for justice. He often uses a comparison strategy not only lefter the religious movement but to the liberal movement.
As a results, it enhances his credibility that he is a well-educated and sincerely man who has not only knowledge about religion but history as well. However, he suggests that when laws are unjust; it is not wrong to disobey them. He makes a very logical set of distinctions between just and unjust laws, to justify his action. Let us turn to a more concrete example of just and unjust laws.
An unjust law is a code that a minority inflicts on a minority that is not binding in itself.
This is difference made legal. On the other hand, a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow, and that it is willing to follow itself. This is sameness made legal. Let me give another explanation.]