Prejudice in twelve angry men -

Prejudice in twelve angry men Video

12 Angry Men - Themes - Prejudice prejudice in twelve angry men Prejudice in twelve angry men

It also explores the power one person has to elicit change. The jury members are identified only by number; no names are revealed until an exchange of dialogue at the very end. The film forces the characters and audience to evaluate their own self-image through observing the personality, experiences, and actions of the jurors.

Prejudice In 12 Angry Men With Clouded Judgement

The film is also notable for its almost exclusive use of one set, where all but three minutes of the film takes place. Inthe film was for the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".

In the overheated jury room of the New York County Courthousea jury prepares to deliberate the case of an year-old impoverished youth accused of stabbing his father to death. The judge instructs them that if there is prejudice in twelve angry men reasonable doubtthe jurors are to return a verdict of not guilty; if found guilty, the defendant will receive a death sentence.

The verdict must be unanimous. At first, the evidence seems convincing: a neighbor testified to witnessing the defendant stab his father from her window.

prejudice in twelve angry men

Another neighbor testified that he heard the defendant threaten to kill his father and the father's body hitting the ground, and then, through his peephole, saw the defendant run past his door. The boy has a violent past and had recently purchased a switchblade of the same type as was found at the murder scene, but claimed he lost it.


The knife at the scene had been cleaned of fingerprints. The jurors at first seem to prejudice in twelve angry men the decision lightly. Juror 7 in particular is anxious to catch his tickets to the baseball game. In a preliminary vote conducted by Juror 1, all jurors vote guilty except Juror 8, who believes that there should be some discussion before the verdict is made. He says he cannot vote guilty because reasonable doubt exists.

With his arguments seemingly failing to convince any of the other jurors, Juror 8 suggests a secret ballot, from which he will abstain; if all the other jurors still vote guilty, he will acquiesce. The ballot reveals one not guilty vote. Juror 3 immediately accuses Juror 5 who previously said he grew up in the slums like the defendant. As the two bicker, Juror 9 reveals that he changed his vote, respecting Juror 8's motives and agreeing there should be more discussion. Juror 8 argues that the noise of a passing train would have obscured the threat the second witness claimed to have overheard.

Juror read article changes his vote, as does Juror 11, who believes the defendant, had he truly killed his father, would not have returned to the crime scene several hours later prejudice in twelve angry men retrieve the murder weapon as it had already been cleaned of fingerprints. Juror 8 points out that people often say "I'm going to kill you" without literally meaning it. Jurors 5, 6, and 8 further question the second witness's story.

Film Analysis Of The Film 12 Angry Men

Juror 3 is infuriated, and after a verbal argument, tries to attack Juror 8, shouting "I'll kill him! Jurors 2 and 6 change their votes; the jury is now evenly prejuxice. Juror 4 doubts the defendant's alibi, based on the boy's inability to recall certain details regarding his alibi.

prejudice in twelve angry men

Juror 8 tests Juror 4's own memory. He is able to remember events from the previous week, with difficulty similar to the defendant. Jurors 2, 3, and 8 debate whether the defendant could have stabbed his much-taller father from a downward angle, eventually deciding it was physically possible, though awkward.

Juror 5 points out that someone who knew how to use a switchblade would have instead stabbed underhand at an upward angle.

prejudice in twelve angry men

Juror 7 half-heartedly changes his vote, leading to an inquisition by Juror Under duress Juror 7 sloppily says he thinks the boy is not guilty. After another vote, Jurors 12 and 1 also change their votes, leaving only three guilty votes.]

One thought on “Prejudice in twelve angry men

  1. Very useful message

  2. You are absolutely right. In it something is and it is excellent idea. I support you.

Add comment

Your e-mail won't be published. Mandatory fields *