Pros and cons of reconstruction after the civil war - rectoria.unal.edu.co

Pros and cons of reconstruction after the civil war - pity

Faces of Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara at Prasat Bayon. During the 3rd, 4th, and 5th centuries, the Indianised states of Funan and its successor, Chenla , coalesced in present-day Cambodia and southwestern Vietnam. For more than 2, years, what was to become Cambodia absorbed influences from India , passing them on to other Southeast Asian civilisations that are now Thailand and Laos. It is believed that the territory of Funan may have held the port known to Alexandrian geographer Claudius Ptolemy as " Kattigara ". The Chinese chronicles suggest that after Jayavarman I of Chenla died around , turmoil ensued which resulted in the division of the kingdom into Land Chenla and Water Chenla which was loosely ruled by weak princes under the dominion of Java. The Khmer Empire grew out of these remnants of Chenla, becoming firmly established in when Jayavarman II reigned c. He and his followers instituted the cult of the God-king and began a series of conquests that formed an empire which flourished in the area from the 9th to the 15th centuries. The empire's centre of power was Angkor , where a series of capitals were constructed during the empire's zenith. In an international team of researchers using satellite photographs and other modern techniques concluded that Angkor had been the largest pre-industrial city in the world with an urban sprawl of 2, square kilometres 1, square miles. The empire, though in decline, remained a significant force in the region until its fall in the 15th century. pros and cons of reconstruction after the civil war Pros and cons of reconstruction after the civil war

Frank P. On behalf of the Cabinet Committee, the staff, the Technical Board, and the Advisory Council, we stalins left to welcome you to this Conference. Some of you have come from as far away as California. Your presence here gives welcome to the idea back of this Conference.

That is the idea of providing for social security. This conference is an expression of an increasing interest not only in the economic recovery of the nation, but also in the economic security of the individual human beings for whose life, liberty, and happiness the nation was founded and continues to exist.

pros and cons of reconstruction after the civil war

Without less emphasis on the imperative need for economic recovery we must, along with national economic recovery, lay the foundation for individual economic security. Without any let-up in the efforts in behalf read more the more decent conditions of work and a fairer return for those who are doing the work of the world, the people all over America, we believe, wish to make more intelligent provision for the economic security of underprivileged children, the sick, and disabled, the unemployed, and the old.

It is a shallow recovery that would sacrifice the security of millions of people. The economic security of the individual contributes to the recovery and the well-being of the nation, and the recovery of the nation contributes to the security and well-being of the individual. The security of the individual contributes to the security of recovery.

pros and cons of reconstruction after the civil war

With partial recovery there has come in the states and nation something more of security to the homes, savings, source, forests, schools, work, and hopes of the people - but not enough. With more recovery should come more security to human beings everywhere - in childhood, youthful education and opportunity, adult work and savings, sickness, and old age. A few of the American people desire present economic recovery without any fundamental social repairs or reconstruction. A few call for a violent reconstruction regardless of present recovery. Others consider that a sound reconstruction is the only basis for a real recovery.

Order Online

Most of our people are opposed to a mere recovery of the old regime and a false prosperity which would bring on another cruel collapse. The President and the Congress could not have read more the country to remain as it was. Economic society had broken down and had to be mended or it would have tended to crash in its own ruins. This conference is called to consider ways and means of further mending so as to insure more intelligent security against the hazards of modern society. This security is not to be achieved through tyranny and the regimentation of a dictatorship.

Reports & Studies

It is not the security of the complacent privilege and power of the few, but the shared security of the many. It is to be a constitutional and lawful security through the cooperation of the government management, and labor. Real security never comes at the sacrifice of real liberty. The people must preserve the substance and spirit of the old liberties through a new security. An increase in economic security should mean an advance in human liberty and social well-being. Human beings read article cooperating to win security against wild animals, the elements, and the wilderness did not thereby destroy their individual initiative and daring enterprise, but rather liberated for higher reaches the mind and spirit of men.

With cooperation for social insurance will come a higher level of economic security. A higher level of economic security should mean a higher level of human liberty.]

One thought on “Pros and cons of reconstruction after the civil war

  1. Pros and cons of reconstruction after the civil war Voodooshura :

    So happens. We can communicate on this theme.

Add comment

Your e-mail won't be published. Mandatory fields *