De jure v de facto segregation -

De jure v de facto segregation de jure v de facto segregation

Both districts faced the geographic dilemma that confounds most American cities: their neighborhoods were highly segregated by race and therefore so were many of their schools.

Zoning & Local Policy

Seattle, for instance, used race as a tie-breaking factor in filling some oversubscribed high schools. Across the country, hundreds of districts had similar plans. Justice Stephen G. Seattle School District No. Board of Education.

de jure v de facto segregation

But Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. Crucial to his reasoning was the assertion that segregation in Seattle and Louisville was de facto, not de jure—a product of private choices, not state action. Richard Rothstein, an education analyst at the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute, thinks John Roberts is a bad historian.

de jure v de facto segregation

The Color of Law, his powerful history of governmental efforts to impose housing segregation, was written in part as a retort. Governments built highways as buffers to keep the races apart. They used federal mortgage insurance to usher in an era of suburbanization on the condition that developers keep blacks out. From New Dealers to county sheriffs, government agencies at every level helped impose segregation—not de facto but de jure.]

de jure v de facto segregation

One thought on “De jure v de facto segregation

  1. Certainly. So happens. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.

Add comment

Your e-mail won't be published. Mandatory fields *