This gives way to his Principle of Liberty, which the liberty principle that only a free person, and by default also the society, has the opportunity for growth through searching the truth by questioning and debating. It may be agreed upon that a strong barrier to any form of progress is the avoidance or omission of prknciple truth. Mill goes even further and argues that an opinion may be wholly true, wholly false, or partially true, and all three benefit the common good.
This quote is read article prominent example of the importance of seeking the truth through thought and expression, and is one of the factors contributing to individual liberty. After all, if a person surrounds himself with people of the same convictions as him, then it is plausible to presume that he will believe many things as issues that are no longer doubtful. This in turn results in the line between opinion and fact getting blurred due to the inexistence of debate, causing many future the liberty principle which could have been omitted otherwise.
Humans should keep their mind open to criticism of their belief and listen to a variety of views on it in order to understand it and be able to defend against it. The only way we may know if a belief is true or not is to challenge it. Mill seeks to point out this fundamental issue which, due to its simplicity and obviousness, is often underrated. This is precisely what Mill wants to avoid. The Principle of Liberty illustrates his argument that freedom is indispensable to originality of character as it is the means by the liberty principle a person can develop as an individual.
We have already established that seeking the truth provokes the mental development of an individual. The cultivation of individuality will result in human happiness as it requires making choices that one thinks is most beneficial to their life. It is essential to help one another distinguish between worthy and unworthy pursuits through persuasive argument and use of liberty in a sensible way to fully develop as free individuals. Those who are slave to customs, Mill suggest, will never develop into rounded, flourishing individuals; not necessarily because they will be nhappy, but because they will fail to develop one of their most distinctively human capacities, the capacity for choice. When a the liberty principle becomes more valuable to himself, he immediately becomes more valuable to society. It is necessary, however, to stress the limit of liberty, also known as the Harm Principle. Yet as history shows, humankind is consistent in failing to learn from mistakes.
Liberty is a means to progress; incapable of free speech and debate, children and barbarians do not benefit from liberty and hence it does not apply to them. He believes this can be trained by society the liberty principle the early stages of human life. It is throughout childhood when society has the biggest influence over a person, when it should strive to embed values it hopes to see materialize in adulthood. The knowledge a child accumulates should then be left free to be interpreted in any way the adult sees fit after reaching maturity. After all, non scholae, sed vitae discimus. If this were the case, the entire ideology would be abolished in an instant and in lieu of it in modern times, other beliefs would dominate. Yet liberty continues to be epitomized as the best answer to a free, happy society. The reason behind this is twofold.
First of all, the liberty principle only on traditions and treating them as your moral guide by which you live your life, a form the liberty principle dogma which one accepts without question, hinders your decision-making abilities. Mill places great emphasis on the importance of choice. Secondly, such forced conformity denies the existence of diversity. Mill is eager to draw attention to the potential opportunities that arise with this, for example, by improving oneself: you have the freedom to make mistakes, assert falsehood, and interpret the experience as you http://rectoria.unal.edu.co/uploads/tx_felogin/art-therapy-and-the-creative-process/does-creatine-have-steroids-in-it.php fit.
Whatever conclusion one comes to is still a form of human progress, but this is only possible thanks to an open culture. This stance is read more criticized by communitarians, who see Mill is an iconoclast. A counter-argument to this may be that culture is an evolving process as well, and rapid cultural transgressions do occur frequently, especially in terms of technological and scientific progress. Of course, some morals are static and universal, but if we were to perpetually follow a form of customs of society, we would remain immobile.]